In the waking world, I finished Augustine's City of God yesterday, an undertaking that began two months and 1100 pages ago. As often happens when I read famous writers, I found that certain "Augustinian" stereotypes didn't hold up. For instance,
- Augustine respects Plato as the pagan philosopher closest to figuring things out (other than Plotinus), but he differs from both thinkers to a degree that makes the label "Neo-Platonist" a hair misleading. Moreover, his primary complaints involve the Platonists' and Neo-Platonists' not being Jewish enough. John Milbank's Theology and Social Theory is far more a Neo-Platonist book than is Augustine's City of God.
- Augustine is not the despiser of the human body and matter that my medieval literature class made him out to be. One of his primary beefs with Plotinus is Plotinus' denial that the body is good. God said material creation was good, so Augustine tends to agree. Moreover, postlapsarian sex is fallen in Augustine's mind not because it involves pleasure (he's no despiser of pleasure--just read his chapters on the resurrection) but because the male sexual apparatus functions apart from the will, rising at inopportune moments and refusing to rise when good moments arrive. In Paradise all parts of the body were, as they will be in the Resurrection, extensions (pun intended) of the human will. Resurrected bodies will need neither cold showers nor Viagra. Moreover, women in the resurrection will remain physically women; he counters vigorously that "perfection" of women will involve their turning into men.
- He is not the humorless theologian of sin and doom that he's sometimes made out to be. I suppose this stereotype better fits with Calvin's reputation, but I've heard it nonetheless. Augustine has a vibrant sense of wonder, and on occasion he even cracks a joke.
No comments:
Post a Comment